General
NFPA 921, Guide for Fire & Explosion Investigation (2011)
NFPA 1033, Standard for Professional Qualifications for Fire Investigator (2009)
NAS Report, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States, A Path Forward (2009)
Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong, Brandon Garrett
Hewitt, Terry-Dawn and McKenna, Wayne J., A Perfect Storm Brewing for Fire Investigators in Court (March 3, 2014).
Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2381519 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381519
Arson and the Science of Fire by Ken Strutin
Suspicious Burn Pattern Analysis Attributed to Ignitable Liquids
Report of the Texas Forensic Science Commission; Willingham/Willis Investigation (2011)
Fire Pattern Analysis and Case Study Review in Post-Flashover Fires
Changes in Determination of Arson
Another Arson Conviction Challenged, Jack Nicas – Boston Globe, (9/8/2010)
Fire and Innocence, Dave Mann – Texas Observer
Intentional Fires and Arson, John Hall – Fire Analysis and Research Div., National Fire Protection Assoc. (2007)
Flashover
Negative Corpus
Area of Origin Determination in a Post-Flashover Fire
Bieber, P.; Forensic Fire Scene Examination – What it Tells Us, and What it Doesn’t
California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, FORUM Magazine, July 2013
CFI Trainer learning module, Post Flashover Fires
Accelerant Detection K-9’s
Kurz ME, Schultz S, Griffith J, Broadus K, Sparks J, Dabdoub G, Brock J. Effect of Background Interference on Accelerant Detection by Canines. J Forensic Sci 1996; 41(5):868-873
Relevant cases:
U.S. v Myer
(finding the testimony of a dog handler inconsistent with NFPA 921)
U.S. v. Hebshie
(court finds the proper use of the k-9 is to assist in the location of evidence, not as a confirmation)
Jackson v. McQuiggin, (Eastern Dist. Michigan, Southern Div.2012) U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158773 / 2012 WL 5410993
(allowing testimony of dog handler in the absence of confirming lab results)
Fones v. State, 765 So.2d 849, 850 (Fla.App.2000)
(permitting testimony of accelerant detection despite absence of lab results)
Reisch v. State, 1993 WL 227264, *2, 1993 Del.Lexis 229 at *4-6 (1993)
(affirming admitting accelerant detection testimony in absence of lab tests paired with testimony that the dog was better than 50% reliable)
State v. Buller, 517 N.W.2d 711, 712-14 (Iowa 1994)
(requiring accuracy foundation be laid and making determination of admissibility subject to N.J.R.E. 403 balancing).
Hand-held Hydro-Carbon Detectors
Test of the TIF 8800 Combustible Gas Detector in a Post Flashover Environment